Equality of Narrative Inclusion in Decision-Making Processes: A Deliberative Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper explores the relationship between narrative inclusion and notion of equality from perspective theory deliberative democracy. It is based on assumption that taking into account diversity discursive competences influences constructed justifications constituting source legitimacy political decisions. Moving beyond a purely argumentative discourse towards emphasising pluralism provides significant enough modification to claim it constitutes separate model deliberation. At starting point, role purpose presented, as well conditions under which can be incorporated processes. Then, consideration given transformation category brought about by introducing framework subject inclusion. The shift in meaning unconditional equalisation opportunities also addressed, both procedural substantive terms. Finally, outlines possible practical problems risks deliberation may raise.
منابع مشابه
Contingency Management and Deliberative Decision-Making Processes
Contingency management is an effective treatment for drug addiction. The current explanation for its success is rooted in alternative reinforcement theory. We suggest that alternative reinforcement theory is inadequate to explain the success of contingency management and produce a model based on demand curves that show how little the monetary rewards offered in this treatment would affect drug ...
متن کاملDeliberative Decision Making in “Conscious” Software Agents
When we humans are faced with a problem to solve, we often create in our mind different strategies or possible solutions. We imagine the effects of executing each strategy or trial solution without actually doing so. It's a kind of internal virtual reality. Eventually, we decide upon one strategy or trial solution and try solving the problem using it. This whole process is called deliberation. ...
متن کاملThe Ethical Dangers of Deliberative Decision Making
This project benefited from the financial assistance of the Dispute Resolution Research Center at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. I want to thank Stéphane Côté, Sanford DeVoe, Adam Galinsky, Julian House, Keith Murnighan, Brendan Strejcek, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments on early versions of this manuscript. The ...
متن کاملEvaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کاملThe narrative analysis of decision-making process to remarriage
This study was done to investigate female heads of household’s decision-making process for remarriage and its barriers. Since an important part of these women’s life was not researchable through questionnaires and details of their life would be omitted, it's felt the need to do qualitative work; therefore, it's a qualitative study by narrative analysis strategy in which we used both...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spo?ecznej
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2082-3304']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2022.3.49